| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. About game performance on MacBook - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mina Sebiestar wrote: what a garbage specs for 1200$ price tag....its good to be apple. anywho want to play games buy game grade stuff simple. It's worth it just for the trackpad tbh. I've yet to find a laptop to can match it.
- by Die Unknown - at 2015.09.04 05:02:10
|
2. About game performance on MacBook - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Darwin wrote: Ultim8Evil wrote: Well Apple haven't managed it yet, so good luck Most of the issues surrounding Mac game performance have little to do with platform capability and more to do with how games are ported, which is in third-...
- by Die Unknown - at 2015.09.04 04:59:00
|
3. Hit them where it hurts - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
JC Anderson wrote: In the ASCN we used to run these giant convoys that consisted of a dozen or more freighters, and 300 or so escort ships. This usually took place once a month, and took A LOT of planning and prep work. There were no jump freig...
- by Die Unknown - at 2013.02.05 16:34:00
|
4. Hit them where it hurts - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Khanh'rhh wrote: The idea falls flat on it's face because it lacks any consideration for the reality of the situation. Though you may be able to effectively attack the logistics of a large alliance, smaller ones will be much easier to rout in t...
- by Die Unknown - at 2013.02.03 17:26:00
|
5. Hit them where it hurts - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xindi Kraid wrote: Die Unknown wrote: Pohbis wrote: You know, in a war, the military likes to target enemy infrastructure. Like airfields, bridges , roads, ports and bridges . It's much easier and more effective to target the static lo...
- by Die Unknown - at 2013.02.03 13:55:00
|
6. Hit them where it hurts - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pohbis wrote: You know, in a war, the military likes to target enemy infrastructure. Like airfields, bridges , roads, ports and bridges . It's much easier and more effective to target the static locations, like bridges , than trying to catc...
- by Die Unknown - at 2013.02.03 13:40:00
|
7. Hit them where it hurts - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xindi Kraid wrote: I'm confused as to how being able to wardec people in an NPC corp equates to breaking nullsec corps. Or do you happen to know the names of every alt they have and know how this cane be used without such a system being used so...
- by Die Unknown - at 2013.02.03 12:34:00
|
8. Hit them where it hurts - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's not easy to unseat a powerful alliance. More often then not, large alliances are destroyed from within, as opposed to any military action by their enemies. With their large incomes, they can lose a titan on a Monday, and have it replaced on T...
- by Die Unknown - at 2013.02.03 12:13:00
|
9. Friendly Fire - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Destination SkillQueue wrote: Sentamon wrote: baltec1 wrote: more soul crushing lag is just what we need. Doubtful that you'd see more then a couple hundred ships on the same grid with systems such as line of fire, collision damage, an...
- by Die Unknown - at 2013.01.27 16:48:00
|
10. Friendly Fire - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Azitek wrote: Under the conditions you described, it seems like missiles would become heavily favored. Because you could have 200 maelstroms blobbed up, but 100 of those would be taking damage from the others, resulting in lower DPS output and ...
- by Die Unknown - at 2013.01.27 16:13:00
|
11. Friendly Fire - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dave Stark wrote: nothing stops you shooting people in your fleet, friendly fire exists. You misunderstand proposed mechanic. Friendly fire is there to stop overview-only gameplay and introduce more strategy and complexity. I doubt that man...
- by Die Unknown - at 2013.01.27 15:21:00
|
12. Friendly Fire - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So by now we've all heard about the 2800+ ship battle that has just taken place. I will be the first to admit that this is one way in which eve is unique to all other MMOs currently out there. The news of the battle have now spread beyond eve-cent...
- by Die Unknown - at 2013.01.27 14:27:00
|
13. [BULK] WTS: 150x Brutixes for 3.3bil - in Sell Orders [original thread]
You are welcome to make an alternative offer
- by Die Unknown - at 2011.10.19 10:08:00
|
14. [BULK] WTS: 150x Brutixes for 3.3bil - in Sell Orders [original thread]
Product is in Jita and is up on contract
- by Die Unknown - at 2011.10.19 09:43:00
|
15. We should be rewarded for unexpected downtime - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why do people feel so entitled these days? If you can't take a break from eve for a few hours then you have a problem mate.
- by Die Unknown - at 2011.10.08 16:32:00
|
16. WTS 3 60-Day Timecodes Secure only 600mil - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
One for Die Unknown pls
- by Die Unknown - at 2010.05.09 10:43:00
|
17. WTB 60Days GTC 560mil - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
Bumpety bump
- by Die Unknown - at 2010.05.09 10:33:00
|
18. WTB 60Days GTC 560mil - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
Online now. This char.
- by Die Unknown - at 2010.05.09 10:25:00
|
19. Best way to get ridd of negative sec. status? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Ah. I was looking forward to the sex with virgins. I guess I'll have to go and grind. Cheers all
- by Die Unknown - at 2010.04.12 16:38:00
|
20. Best way to get ridd of negative sec. status? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Right o7, I'm on top of it
- by Die Unknown - at 2010.04.12 16:07:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |